Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Edging Towards Dictatorship

Judge Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the US Supreme Court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary. At Georgetown University, Ms O'Connor criticised Republican leaders whose repeated attacks on the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges.

She also pointed to dictatorships in the developing world and former Communist countries as a warning on where interference with the judiciary might lead. "It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings."

Ms O'Connor particularly singled out a warning to the judiciary issued last year by Tom DeLay, the former Republican leader in the House of Representatives (and a thoroughly up-standing citizen), over a court ruling in a controversial "right to die" case. After the decision ordered a brain-dead woman in Florida, Terri Schiavo, removed from life support, Mr DeLay said: "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behaviour."

Mr DeLay later called for the impeachment of judges involved in the Schiavo case, and called for more scrutiny of "an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the President". (Of course, these judges are also charged with sending convicted criminals to jail, - something of great interest to De Lay).

"Such threats," Ms O'Connor said, "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom", and she told the lawyers in her audience: "I want you to tune your ears to these attacks ... You have an obligation to speak up. Statutes and constitutions do not protect judicial independence - people do," she said.

She also noted that death threats against judges were on the rise and added that the situation was not helped by senior senator, and fellow Texan friend of Bush, John Cornyn's suggestion, that there might be a connection between the violence against judges and the decisions they make. This senator made his remarks shortly after a judge was shot dead in an Atlanta courtroom and the family of a federal judge was murdered in Illinois giving very real impression of threat unless judges do as he believes they should.

Senator Cornyn said: "I don't know if there is a cause and effect connection (there isn't), but we have seen some recent episodes of courthouse violence in this country ... And I wonder whether there may be some connection between the perception in some quarters, on some occasions, where judges are making political decisions yet are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in violence."

Although appointed by a Republican, Ms O'Connor voted with the supreme court's liberals on some divisive issues, including abortion, making her a frequent target for criticism from the right. After announcing that she intended to retire last year at the age of 75, she was replaced in February this year by Samuel Alito, who is generally regarded as being more consistently conservative.

In her speech, Ms O'Connor said that if the courts did not occasionally make politicians mad they would not be doing their jobs, and their effectiveness "is premised on the notion that we won't be subject to retaliation for our judicial acts". Her comments need to be heard by a much wider audience than a room full of lawyers.


sandegaye said...

I've never been a fan of O'Conners.. she was once almost my sister-in-law.. but family fueds aside, she does make a valid point.
And that pic of Bush is classic!!
The Darkside Dick-tator.

sandegaye said...

Someone buy me a spell-check. The word is 'feuds'. ;o)

Mark said...

Don't worry abuot speling, - I'm not the graetest iethre.

I think what impressed me was that her was a right-winger having a go at more extreme right-wingers, and I feel she needs to be supported. However, should does need to speek out in more public formats if anyone will take notice.

jane said...

Our Supreme Court oddly enough constitutes 9 judges & just 1 of them is a woman. Could you imagine how odd our country would be if it were 90% men and 10% women? So much for equal representation. We've got a lot to learn & hopefully we'll learn it before it's too late.